Keep playing.with 3-4 players, each player can be judge three times. To this, I might explain that, though TS2 might not be the best sequel out there (I personally might have picked The Dark Knight or Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo ), it was my favorite of the seven choices I had. Now this is the part of the game where there will be some spirited debate ("Better than The Godfather? Surely you jest!" "But I thought EVERYONE liked Grease!" "I thought you were a huge fan of Ghostbusters!"). This rule is in place to combat the runaway problem. If, say, four people had chosen my answer, I would have gotten three points because you can never score more than three in a round. Because two people picked my answer, I get two points. Two people voted on that, so they each get one point. I now reveal my answer - Toy Story 2! The blue player wrote that answer, so they get one point. If you're feeling confident, you can even vote on yourself. You can put one on each of two different cards, or you can put them both on the same card. I put the SOM5K™ face down, and now it's time to vote.Īll player can now distribute their voting chips. I turn the pointer (there's an arrow on the actual SOM5K™) to the color of the response I think best represents what I would choose. Now it's time for me to pick, using the Select-O-Matic 5000™. Someone writes down "The Two Towers." Someone writes down "X2." Someone writes down "Toy Story 2." Another player was in the process of writing down "Superman 2", but were beaten to it, so they must change their answer to "Ghostbusters 2." One player writes "Grease 2" (either because they don't know me at ALL, or because they're being silly), and the last player writes down "The Godfather part II." The other players then write down what they think my answer will be.
#BOARDGAMEGEEK WITS AND WAGERS QUESTIONS MOVIE#
For this explanation, I'll choose "In my opinion, what's the best movie sequel of all time?"
The starting player (the shortest) draws a question card, and chooses one of the five. There's a Select-O-Matic 5000™ for the judge, and 80 question cards with five questions on each.Īt the start of the game, each player chooses a color, taking the corresponding answer board and voting tokens. There's a dry-erase scoreboard, with eight rows in the player colors.
Each color is marked with its own symbol for people with color perception problems. There are 16 player tokens, two in each color.
/pic2558555.jpg "boardgamegeek wits and wagers questions")
Just go ahead and buy some won't cost that much more, and you'll have a more reliable set of markers. There are eight dry-erase markers in the game, but in my copy, half didn't work. In the game, you get eight dry-erase boards in eight player colors. The game was conceived as a synthesis of Apples to Apples and Wits & Wagers, adding judging of player answers and betting on the response together into one game. If you only have three or four players, play something else. It is for 3-8 players, but you really need several people. The game was designed by Dominic Crapuchettes and Satish Pillalamarri. Say Anything was published in 2008 by Northstar Games, publishers of W&W. We'll start with one that is a synthesis of two games I talked about in the first party game series, Wits & Wagers and Apples to Apples. In that spirit, let's talk about some alternatives to the typical party games you find in Wal-Mart. The combination of simple rules and the ability to involve a large group makes them good for a gathering. However, there's no doubt that party games are very accessible to a wide range of people, particularly non-gamers. Over time, I've decided that I'm not a huge fan of party games.I tend to think they work better as activities.
#BOARDGAMEGEEK WITS AND WAGERS QUESTIONS SERIES#
Greatgamegate The second series I did on this blog was a party game series, and I think it's high time I revisit the genre.
0 kommentar(er)
